buildWaferMap infers whatever geometry you leave out, working backwards
from the extent of your data. This page is that one question from three angles:
how much you supply (how the map changes as dieConfig
and waferConfig are filled in), when inference alone is not
enough (data that does not span the whole wafer, where the extent is a
misleading guide), and how you get told when the library knows the
geometry is a guess.
Cards A–G are all built from one identical results array.
Inference levels — same data, different geometry context A — no geometry, normalized units. B — die size only, diameter inferred. C — diameter only, pitch estimated, notch visible. D — fully specified with a 5 mm edge exclusion band (dimmed dies are excluded from yield).
units: 'normalized' — proportionally correct but not in mm.
units: 'mm'
units: 'mm'
Centre anchoring — when inference needs help, and when it doesn't
Inference cannot tell a small full wafer apart from a slice of a big one.
E — a tested half-wafer with no geometry is mistaken for a small full wafer and mis-centred.
F — supplying waferConfig.center (the prober coordinate of the wafer centre) anchors it correctly.
G — sparse data is different: positions are missing but the extent still reaches the wafer edge, so centre and diameter resolve without a hint.
The notes under each card read result.inference.warnings directly. Hover card E and
you will also see the library's own ⚠ indicator in its toolbar — it raises partial-coverage and now
says so on screen, without the page doing anything (see the next section).
center anchors prober (0,0) to the true wafer centre, so the tested half sits on
the right side of a full 300 mm wafer.
center.
Positions are missing across the whole wafer, but the extent still reaches the edge — so the
centre and diameter resolve correctly without a center hint.
Warnings the library surfaces itself
Bad geometry is only worth detecting if somebody is told. The library raises structured
advisories — result.warnings from inference, summary.stats.warnings
from analysis — and now shows them itself: a ⚠ indicator appears in the toolbar
only when there is something to say. It is not a toast; these are persistent conditions about
whether the map can be trusted, so the explanation stays retrievable.
H — an analysis advisory (amber ⚠). I — the opt-out for apps
with their own notification UI.
analyzeWaferMap computed no test findings at all — a silent
absence, since nothing throws and the map renders fine. Severity warning
(⚠ amber): what is drawn is correct, a feature just produced nothing. Geometry advisories
are error (⛔ red) instead, because the dies themselves may be misplaced.
collectWarnings if you want the same set without
mounting a map at all.